ERECTING DEFENSIVE LINES ACROSS EURASIA
* * *
(Events are moving fast all
over Eurasia, while geopolitical blocs are cementing, centered around the
Western world and the Bricsian countries. Here are some tweets posted on X
in the last few days.)
* * *
Argentina was supposed to
join the BRICS informal economic association, but a new pro-US government was
elected and chose not to join the group. As for Saudi Arabia, it was interested
in joining the BRICS and was formally invited to do so, but its government
apparently decided to wait a little before it finalize its inclusion, probably
in order to see the outcome of the Israeli war, a major event that may
determine who will be the preeminent power in the Middle East in the near
future: America or China.
https://www.modernghana.com/news/1365723/brics-expansion-implications-for-africa-and-the.html
* * *
The London-based The
Economist may see one day the start of a widespread, violent civil war in
Georgia, Myanmar-style, with tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands,
of dead people all over the place. The Anglo-Americans are good in spreading
divisions and fear. Myanmar is a broken country these days, mostly because of
their meddling, turning the younger Bamar population and the national
minorities against the older Bamar population and the central government.
Whatever happen in the next few weeks and months, the whole population of
Georgia, both old and young, will decide where to lean politically, whether
toward Brussels or toward Moscow. The European Union is richer but much further
away than the Russian Federation, a political entity that also keep in its
hands two important bargaining tools: Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two
autonomous territories that formally belong to Georgia but are protected by
Russia. Russia has some more cards to play. It is a member of the BRICS and of
the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. It is also protecting tiny Armenia,
located just to the south of Georgia and to the north of Iran, with a military
base near Yerevan, capital of the Armenian republic. It must be added here that
the Farsi-speaking inhabitants of Iran are also keeping a benevolent eye over
the Armeni-speaking inhabitants of Armenia, those two ancient Indo-European
peoples having lived side by side in the Middle East for at least two millennia,
mostly peacefully. All this mean that the slow erection of a defensive line is
going on, running from Arkhangelsk, in the northern part of European Russia,
to Abadan, in the southern part of Iran, passing through both Georgia and
Armenia. That new style 'Iron Curtain' is useful for Beijing, in its
current tug of war with Washington, protecting China and the other SCO group of
countries on their western, continental flank. China may then concentrate on
its eastern, maritime flank, facing Taiwan and the first island chain. That
western wall will neatly counter the new NATO defensive line, presently running
from Norway to the Turkish Straits, then to Anatolia. Thus, two 'Iron Curtains'
will be facing each other. For decades, the central part of the NATO defensive
position was located along the north-south corridor Germany / Alps / Italy,
with lateral wings north and southeast. That central part has been pushed by
America toward Russia in the last decades and now runs along the north-south
corridor Poland / Carpathians / Rumania, again with lateral wings north
and south, following the gradual eastward expansion of NATO that played such an
ominous and fateful part in the two Ukrainian wars, the one that took place in
2014 and the one that started in 2022. The new defensive line of the Western
world will likely stay in place for the time being, at least for its central
part. Even though Turkiye is now a BRICS partner, it is unclear whether it may
choose to continue its long-standing association with the Western-oriented NATO
or joining one day the Eurasian-oriented SCO. Time will tell. As for the
collective security arrangements of continental Europe, they are currently
provided through the NATO framework. Whether this change one day for a
different arrangement, through a European Union umbrella instead of a NATO one,
will depend a lot on what would unfold under the next US administration, a few
weeks from now, starting in January 2025...
https://www.economist.com/europe/2024/12/15/protests-threaten-georgias-kremlin-friendly-government
* * *
Washington is cementing its
military relations with Japan and the Philippines, those two countries forming
a kind of barrier separating China from the Pacific Ocean, along an elongated
axis shaped by the Japanese archipelago, the Ryukyus archipelago and the
Filipino archipelago. The island of Formosa, the seat of the Chinese province
of Taiwan, lies just between the Japanese Empire and the Philippines Republic
and remain at the very crux of the current growing tensions between Washington
and Beijing.
https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/South-China-Sea/Philippine-Senate-ratifies-military-access-pact-with-Japan
* * *
Both Malaysia and Thailand
are partners of the BRICS countries, and this fact must be an important factor
in these announcements. The economic investments will serve to alleviate
poverty and to reduce the ethnic tensions arising from the Malay rebellion in
the three southernmost provinces of Thailand, a mainly Buddhist country, just
like Myanmar to the westward of it, and Laos and Cambodia to its eastward.
Obviously, the hand of Beijing is at work here, especially when one considers
the proposed alignment of high-speed railway lines between the two southeast
Asian countries. The construction of a high-speed rail connection between
Kunming, the capital of the Chinese province of Yunnan, and Singapore, the
mainly sinophone city-state that sit at the southern tip of the Malayan
peninsula has long been a dream of the Chinese government. That dream seemingly
just crossed another step in its implementation.
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3291031/malaysia-and-thailand-seek-revive-border-area-bridge-and-rail-upgrade?share=IlfprJSDm%2FYcW3wgP7lMCT838Ye01mbUVAkFDKByn6RxHhp6uOQqE1kCNn52pKnVj3zNiH%2FS7lw8kiNwOY1C5Ly1quicNLfxjUJDfH7Qaa6O%2BeuF7InMclSIYrQjlbez82231iJtQrBi%2Fv2e1bs8EA%3D%3D
* * *
According to The Economist,
Israel intends to open more civilian settlements all over the Golan Heights,
annexed since the 1967 Six-Days war, presumably to anchor it more firmly into
Israeli Hebrew-speaking society. The new Syrian government may change its tune
about Israel if that country's far-right government continue to 1) overfly it
with warplanes as if it own the sky over Syria, 2) use the very convenient
"terrorism" epithet to bomb Syrian-held territory with impunity, 3)
encroach a little too much on its traditional lands or 4) persist with the same
deplorable looking-down-on-you attitude it seems to have toward its many (and
collectively powerful) Arab neighbors.
https://www.india.com/news/world/syria-civil-war-israel-changes-stance-on-syria-after-hayat-tahrir-al-sham-abu-mohammad-al-julani-statement-israeli-army-idf-chief-herzi-halevi-mount-hermon-golan-heights-occupation-netanyahu-khamenei-7467387/?usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM=&_kit=1
*
* *
There is one big difference
between Syria and Myanmar. Assad's foreign backers were in no position to
support his government when push came to shove. The Assad house of cards
crumbled. The government of Myanmar is not in the same situation. Its huge northeastern
neighbor, China, has sunk a lot of money over there, in economic projects, and
it can intervene militarily if the need arises, in order to protect its
investments and also to ensure a direct access to the Indian Ocean, bypassing
the Strait of Malacca. As an aside, it must be said that the Indian government
may be playing a discreet role in the Burmese crisis, along with Britain and
America, since it has almost no allies around it, and the easiest direction in
which to gradually develop its economic and political influence is not to the
north (China) or to the west (Muslim countries), but to the south (Maldives,
Sri Lanka) and, especially, to the east, toward the continental part of the
ASEAN countries.
https://johnmenadue.com/european-deportation-of-syrian-refugees-a-sign-of-the-times/
* * *
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire
Bonjour, tous les commentaires sont acceptés, dans la mesure où ils sont d'ordre professionnel. Insulteurs s'abstenir...